Talk:UK raises terrorism alert level to "severe"

Review of revision 942314 [Passed]

Revision 942314 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Quotes seem a bit close... but IMO, you can't copyright a quote. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 942314 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Quotes seem a bit close... but IMO, you can't copyright a quote. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Is it really necessary to call the failed Christmas bombing "alleged?" It's pretty obvious it was no accident, with him confessing, his links to terrorist organizations, and al-qaeda explaining in detail their responsibility of the attack. This is comparable to calling the 9/11 attacks "allegedly by al-qaeda."