Talk:US Senate confirms Clinton as Secretary of State
Explanations[edit]
(note: this is not an actual review, i just read through the article once) Hmm, I think this article is pretty good, but could do a better job at explaining why the Clinton foundation needs to make donations public (it makes sense the third read through, but the first two time I read it, i got confused). Also could be better with explaining what UN ambassador nomination has to do with anything. Cheers. Bawolff ☺☻ 04:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I edited to address these. Unfortunately my prose in the 2nd paragraph is very stilted. Anyone is welcome to fix it. --InfantGorilla (talk) 10:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Wikidsoup --InfantGorilla (talk) 19:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Time[edit]
Is it just me or is the UTC time off 12 hours, I would think that it should have been 00:29 UTC
- Oops - my fault - thanks! Actually 10 hours off. I just fixed it. --InfantGorilla (talk) 15:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Peer review[edit]
 |
Revision 755583 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: It should be copyedited to address Bawolff's concerns (above). However, it is good enough to publish now. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 755583 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: It should be copyedited to address Bawolff's concerns (above). However, it is good enough to publish now. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |