Talk:WWE Raw Results from Memphis, TN for September 15, 2008

Original notes from my recap article on AngryMarks.com Kamnet (talk) 01:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Major notes Kamnet (talk) 19:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC):

   * Show opens with Jericho vs. Punk for WHC, Steel cage match, Jericho wins after leaving cage first
   * Candice Michelle d. Jillian Hall by pinfall
   * Jericho talks to Adamle about being used too much, needs "taken care of"
   * John Layfield d. Tommy Dreamer by pinfall
   * Layfield protest in ring for #1 Contender, Randy Orton out to yell at Layfield
   * IC Champ Santino Marella & Women's Champ Beth Phoenix out to yell at Orton
   * Dave Batista out to yell at all four
   * Announcement that #1 Contender determined at end of show, Batista attacks everybody
   * Manu/Cody Rhodes/Ted Dibiase Jr d. Kofi Kingston/Jerry Lawler/Charlie Haas
   * Jamie Noble d. Paul Burchill by pinfall
   * Rey Mysterio Jr d. Kane by DQ
   * Adamle announces JBL vs. Batista at PPV to determine #1 Contender, Jericho to defend title against Shawn Michaels in Ladder Match at PPV

Peer review

Revision 694035 of this article has been reviewed by Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: fail, author of this article wrote the second source and the OR notes aren't very detailed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I have seen there are some concerns about newsworthiness, but I'd say it qualifies as news, and the article is really well written Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 694035 of this article has been reviewed by Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: fail, author of this article wrote the second source and the OR notes aren't very detailed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I have seen there are some concerns about newsworthiness, but I'd say it qualifies as news, and the article is really well written Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Peer review 2

Revision 694361 of this article has been reviewed by Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: great article The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 694361 of this article has been reviewed by Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: great article The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.