Talk:Weather bureau forecasts an early spring for Australia
Review of revision 1064351 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 1064351 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1064351 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Problems and errors[edit]
WA is the only region we have an ag source, and it suggests over-all the weather will be *negative*. 45-50% chance of above average rainfall means 50-55% chance of below average rainfall. (More importantly, it states harvest predictions of 21.9m, which is up from last year's 21.7m but down from earlier predictions of 22.5m)
This article is for all intents and purposes a re-write of the Australian article, with almost no improvement over the original. No one even went to find the original forecasts, which can be found here. The article was poorly written (although I have to thank whoever realized that northern hemisphere readers are often too self-centered to remember the seasons are opposite in the southern hemisphere.) It should not have been published in its earlier form as it consistently stated prognostications as facts. - Amgine | t 16:36, 23 July 2010 (UTC)