Talk:Yahya Jammeh wins Gambia presidential election

Review of revision 1329691 [Not ready]

Revision 1329691 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The account of ECOWAS's investigations gives something of an impression of their having investigated this election, because there's a key piece of information missing here: that ECOWAS refused to send observers. It's also peculiar that the last sentence of that paragraph mentions only two out of the three groups that sent observers according to BBC (the third being the Commonwealth). Adding significant information is problematic for an independent reviewer, and in this case I'm not comfortable doing so. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1329691 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The account of ECOWAS's investigations gives something of an impression of their having investigated this election, because there's a key piece of information missing here: that ECOWAS refused to send observers. It's also peculiar that the last sentence of that paragraph mentions only two out of the three groups that sent observers according to BBC (the third being the Commonwealth). Adding significant information is problematic for an independent reviewer, and in this case I'm not comfortable doing so. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1329986 [Passed]

Revision 1329986 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:24, 26 November 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1329986 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:24, 26 November 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Typo in page name

{{editprotected}} The word "presidental" should be "presidential". This was corrected at w:Portal:The Gambia/In the news/Wikinews, but the bot immediately re-imported the wrong spelling. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Done Though since this is where the spelling resides, it seems odd to superficially "correct" the spelling somewhere else. --Pi zero (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. -- John of Reading (talk) 19:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)