Jump to content

Homophobic? Really?

Homophobic? Really?

Edited by another user.
Last edit: 15:00, 26 March 2012

Ok, i havent seen the Ad myself, but i get a really good idea from the article (Btw nice job on that) so i want to discuss, can this really be considered homophobic or sexist? I honestly think not. As i have said I have not seen this ad for myself (a link to it would be apreciated)but I will put my argument this way, if no men are waiting or bar tending, its sexist. therefore using this logic (the same logic of the people who say this ad is sexist) then unless there was a waiter or bartender of every ethnicity, then i can call the same ad racist. See the issue with this? Advertisers dont want to get actors of every race, sex, or sexuality. Why? first off, it cost more money. Second off, they dont have large amounts of ad space for that many actors. I believe these are the true reasons behind there choice of actors for this ad, not because there sexist,racists, or homophobic.

All this aside i truly do believe that this has happened solely because the world is getting over-sensitive about things.

Thoughts? (also if this is true i guess we can shut down all the hooters out there O.O)

Sporemolux (talk)14:17, 26 March 2012

"the world is getting over-sensitive about things." or rather the world has certain civility standards, you have a problem with. why the bankers didn't nip this earlier is a question, probably fighting a losing battle. Slowking4 (talk) 15:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Slowking4 (talk)15:22, 26 March 2012