User talk:Big67

Regarding Image:Nuvola important icon.png

In what ways is this: File:Nuvola important icon.png an improvement of this: ? Regards. Adambro 22:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

It looks better. Big67 00:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

template:test2

I reverted your edits, as i feel the icon is too scary looking for that template. see my edit summary too. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your recent edits

Hi there Big67, just a quick note about your recent edits. I note you've made a number of changes to warning templates and such like. My suggestion would be to leave these alone as it is probably more appropriate for more established contributors to make changes to these as they are in a better position to understand the community feeling about such templates and therefore ensure their changes reflect that feeling.

Also, regarding User:Big67/Unsourced, I'm not sure what your intention is for this but it might be useful to highlight that there is already a similar template on Wikinews called {{sources}}. Regards. Adambro 15:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

But my version of the sources template has a better design. Also, on {{test3}} and {{stop}}, I was updating the images, it has been discussed on the other projects to use the shiny versions > the regular versions. Big67 17:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

It hasn't been discussed here, we can be rather conservative about things like that. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 17:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

But it has been discussed on Meta, and Meta is co-ordination for all projects. Big67 17:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Policy issues and major changes to Wikinews operation are discussed on Wikinews and acted upon by the community after discussion and or voting. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 17:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

To further what DF said, we do not care what meta thinks. The last meta project to equalize all the projects ended up being deleted. I would highly suggest discussing changes first, or you are not going to accomplish anything at all. Bawolff ☺☻ 21:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree, start a discussion here before making any further changes. Thunderhead 01:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Ban

I have banned you for 24 hrs for breaking the 3 revert rule on both of the templates you have been editing. I would also like to reiterate that you cannot just change images because you think they look better and decisions have been made on meta. That is not good enough, decisions and talks must happen here. --MarkTalk 21:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC) {{unblock|Those were good faith edits. Big67 22:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)}}

{{unblock-no|Brian McNeil / ^talk|good faith would involve communication with the community you are imposing on.}} --Brian McNeil / ^talk 22:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock|But I was giving {{vandal warning}} proper grammar. Plus , the icons attract attention, and the information icon is better on {{editprotected}} because the caution sign gives the wrong impression. Big67 01:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)}}

{{unblock-no|Zachary|Your edits violated our 3 revert rule policy, so your block is justified.}} Zachary 03:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Common Nation

I am the Editor in Chief of Common Nation. Common Nation is updated with the lastest national and political news as well as family, social, and health coverage. Let me know what you think! Asher Heimermann|Talk 22:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyright image in the first topic

A file that you made in the first message is deleted because this is a copycat image from Wikimedia commons do not copycat from others next time. Snjsjd (talk) 06:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)