User talk:BruceKinnaird

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How have you found this information? In the absence of any explanation of this I'm considering this article to be a hoax. Adambro (talk) 11:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced / hoax articles[edit]

These all appear to be hoax articles - do you have any sources at all to back up any of this? Cirt (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]


You have been blocked from Wikinews for 24 hours for creating multiple hoax articles. Your edits have been reverted or removed. If you wish to talk to an administrator about this, please go to Wikinews IRC, send a message to wikinews-l@wikimedia.org or add {{Unblock|reason}} to your talk page.

Cirt (talk) 13:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not submit hoaxes, these were genuine articles. I think they should go through the normal deletion process instead of being speedily deleted. The first two were my own original reporting. --BruceKinnaird (talk) 13:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While you are waiting for another admin to review your block, it would be helpful if you could provide some source of verification here on your talk page that the above listed deleted articles were note all hoaxes. Cirt (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should this user be unblocked?
Should this user be unblocked?

Anonymous101 has reviewed BruceKinnaird's request to be unblocked, and the result was declined.
The reason given by Anonymous101 was: none of your claims have been covered anywhere else. Therefore is is reasonable to presume they are hoaxes. If I am mistaken please provide evidence indicating that .
Further debate can proceed here, however, the administrator's decision may be final, and the result of administrative consensus.


The articles were original reporting, not hoaxes. These should be taken to a wider forum, e.g. WN:AAA

Should this user be unblocked?
Should this user be unblocked?

SVTCobra has reviewed BruceKinnaird's request to be unblocked, and the result was declined.
The reason given by SVTCobra was: no substantiation for any of the claims.
Further debate can proceed here, however, the administrator's decision may be final, and the result of administrative consensus.


Hoax articles[edit]

Please do not recreate these hoax articles. The burden of proof is on you to substantiate the claims which you continue to fail to do. --SVTCobra 14:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

Your page User:BruceKinnaird/Block log of wheels has been nominated for deletion. --Whitealbert (talk) 14:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]