User talk:SVTCobra/2006 Archive

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Stevenfruitsmaak in topic Top story
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


SVTCobra/2006 Archive, welcome to Wikinews! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these!

Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews:

There are always things to do on Wikinews:

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! FellowWikiNews (W) 23:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Fellow. --SVTCobra 16:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I see you have the welcome, I think all your article needed was expanded a bit before publishing. Plus a new title, titles are unique on Wikinews, we can never re-use them so you need to look at all the information you bring to the article and pick out some unique, but hopefully catchy point about it and use that as the title. I would have come back and worked on the article, or someone else would have picked up on it later on, I'm dealing with some older stuff that hasn't been properly proofed. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hi Brian, I changed the title to something more unique. I see your point about expanding the article, but I re-read the sources. There really isn't alot of info here. They all use fluff whether it be about another incident or the politics of Australia. Also, they don't agree on much. They can't agree whether the attackers had mortars or rockets. They can't agree whether there was air support in repelling the attack. (for others we are talking about this article)
Yup, I commented on the page, I read one of the sources and skimmed the other two - it is pretty thin, bulk it up with pictures, or {{Wikinews Today short infobox}} (shown here to bulk up this comment). However, always aim for two paragraphs, and four sentences minimum with the {{expand}} tag. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


I, FellowWikiNews (W), hereby award you the Wikinews Trophy for your contributions. I hope to see more good works from you on Wikinews.

Thank you so much. I am honored. It is an honor to just be nominated. There are too many people for me to thank, I cannot possibly list them all. --SVTCobra 00:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


I did see it... about a second after I published mine:) No worries, I had some additional material which I've merged into the existing article. Crimson 02:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


on Talk:Astronomers to vote on potential new planets.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Talk) 10:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


I edited to story to fit the Wikinew Style guide>

- -- Davodd | Talk 21:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Top story

Whenever you feel it is outdated you're welcome to update it -any registered user can.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Although I didn't have to reply: yes, you got it right!--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


Actually, the SVTCobra moment had been on my talk page for some time. Thank you for acknowledging it nonetheless. Now the context is explained. —this is messedrocker (talk) 02:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply