Shortcut:
WN:CHECK

This wiki currently has no local CheckUsers. Please file new CheckUser requests with the stewards at m:SRCU.

Caveats	CheckUser is a last resort for difficult cases, due to the effort involved, difficulty of interpretation of results and privacy issues raised. Use other methods first. Obvious sockpuppets may be treated as such without using CheckUser. DO NOT list non-disruptive "throwaway" accounts that only have a few edits. Data is kept for 90 days so we cannot compare against accounts that have not edited earlier. Block evasion: may be listed where the problem is ongoing. Routine 3RR violations: do not list unless there is: (a) an ongoing problem, (b) reasonable doubt as to whether sockpuppets are being used, and (c) disruption of editing that cannot be otherwise addressed. Vandalism: only for ongoing serious vandalism. Vote fraud: only if: (a) there is reasonable doubt about the validity of votes, (b) the vote or discussion has closed, and (c) the possible sockpuppet votes affect the outcome of the vote. Provide a link to the closed vote or discussion.
Procedure	This wiki currently has no local CheckUsers. All CheckUser requests must be submitted to the stewards at Steward requests/CheckUser. Please follow the instructions on that page carefully. If you need help preparing or submitting a request, you may ask a local administrator for guidance at WN:AAA. Do not post sensitive or private information at WN:AAA or on the public m:SRCU page. Wait for a steward or administrator to provide instructions for transmitting such information securely.
Outcomes	The outcome will be posted at m:SRCU. If local admin action is required as a result of the outcome, post a request at WN:AAA. Do not post sensitive or private information at WN:AAA. Instead, link to the relevant discussion at m:SRCU and make a brief, neutral request describing the action sought. Keep the request concise and avoid disclosing any non-public details.

Requests

Check User

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

No local CUs to action this request and confirmation already provided at Wikidata. It might be prudent to leave this archived discussion available until the associated deletion request is closed. Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 01:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tefepit and User:Kannotlogin. Sock of Quienton Declare. BigKrow (talk) 20:02, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

BigKrow, I am not a CU nor an admin, but as of today this wiki currently has no local checkusers. Please forward any future CheckUser requests to m:SRCU. Thanks. Codename Noreste (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

They were both already identified as socks at Wikidata. I don't believe either has violated any policy here with regards to sock use. Neither Tefepit nor Kannotlogin has made any contribution here since this notice and this notice were placed on their talk pages. At this point, I'm not sure what else needs to happen.Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 00:35, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should archive this request, mark this page with {{Historical}} or keep the top message about no local checkusers on Wikinews, and possibly protect this page indefinitely. Codename Noreste (talk) 00:36, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a deletion request associated with this CU request:
Roblox player uncovers cheating, awarded Guinness World Record

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.