Iraqi vote remains in doubt

Sunday, October 23, 2005

Amid concerns of electoral fraud, preliminary results now indicate the province of Nineveh will be the "swing province" deciding the fate of Iraq's constitutional referendum. On October 15, a reported 64% of eligible Iraqis voted in the referendum on the draft Iraqi constitution. One week later, preliminary results are available for fourteen of the eighteen provinces. Two of Iraq's 18 provinces have returned "No" votes, making Nineveh the third and deciding province that could veto the new U.S.-backed charter if rejected by more than a two thirds majority of voters.

Despite a last minute compromise achieved with one political party representing Sunni Arabs, Sunni voters appear to be rejecting the proposed charter by a wide margin. In Anbar, heartland of the insurgency, 96 percent voted "No" and in Salahaddin 81 percent voted "No", according to preliminary results. Nineveh is more ethnically mixed, but still mainly Sunni, and is at the center of fraud concerns when initial tallies of the overall vote appeared to swing wildly

Election officials caution that these preliminary results should not be construed as forecasts, as the ethnic diversity of those who actually voted may not be represented in these preliminary numbers.

Previous related news

"Iraq counting ballots" — Wikinews, October 17, 2005

Sources

"Indications crucial Iraqi province leaning toward 'yes' vote" — CNN.com, October 22, 2005

"Sunni area 'rejects Iraq charter'" — BBC, October 22, 2005

"Election officials pore over Iraq vote in crucial province" — Associated Press, October 22, 2005

Sameer N. Yacoub. "Iraq heading towards a new constitution despite Sunni rejection" — Scotland on Sunday, October 22, 2005

"Iraqi province to make or break charter" — Reuters, Oct 24, 2005 12:26 PM ET

"Iraq releases partial vote results" — Aljazeera, Sunday 23 October 2005

The Age, Melbourne. "US confirms Iraqi mob killed workers" — theage.com, Sunday 23 October 2005

Share this:

This page is archived, and is no longer publicly editable.

Articles presented on Wikinews reflect the specific time at which they were written and published, and do not attempt to encompass events or knowledge which occur or become known after their publication.

Got a correction? Add the template {{editprotected}} to the talk page along with your corrections, and it will be brought to the attention of the administrators.

Please note that due to our archival policy, we will not alter or update the content of articles that are archived, but will only accept requests to make grammatical and formatting corrections.

Note that some listed sources or external links may no longer be available online due to age.