Talk:Alaska Supreme Court rules in Senate election challenge

Review of revision 1149348 [Failed]

Revision 1149348 of this article has been reviewed by Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 06:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: One source NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: There is only one source. You need at least two sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1149348 of this article has been reviewed by Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 06:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: One source NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: There is only one source. You need at least two sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1149352 [Failed]

Revision 1149352 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Hopelessly audience-insensitive title assumes we know a) where this is b) who Miller is c) what his challenge is Comments by reviewer: I wouldn't even name the guy in the title. It's a waste of space sine WN has an international audience who largely won't know who he is. Consider, instead, what the case was about - 'rejects vote count challenge' might work. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1149352 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Hopelessly audience-insensitive title assumes we know a) where this is b) who Miller is c) what his challenge is Comments by reviewer: I wouldn't even name the guy in the title. It's a waste of space sine WN has an international audience who largely won't know who he is. Consider, instead, what the case was about - 'rejects vote count challenge' might work. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1149570 [Passed]

Revision 1149570 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1149570 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.