Talk:Australian Treasurer hands down budget, announces two years of deficits

Notes

Watched the budget speach on ABC News24. It was the parliament house produced feed with ABC graphics.

• "This year, we've faced the second largest write down since the Great Depression"
• Money for Cross river rail in Brisbane, Metro train system in Melbourne
• $12.9 million to connect more LGAs to the NBN
• "We must ensure our economy has the skilled workers it needs"
• Newstart recipients can earn more at paid employment before government payments curtailed
• $40 billion for LGA infrastructure.

I'm working on getting some audio grabs -- RockerballAustralia c 11:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1900118 [Passed]

Revision 1900118 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A nice basic article, but weak sourcing. A second on-line source could easily have been found, and in fact I did go out and find one (at ABC News, in fact) to sanity-check basic facts in the lede. None of the redundant verification one wants for the lede was provided by the broadcast notes. In the end, I had to pull a couple of things because I found no sign of them in either the provided source article or the notes. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1900118 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A nice basic article, but weak sourcing. A second on-line source could easily have been found, and in fact I did go out and find one (at ABC News, in fact) to sanity-check basic facts in the lede. None of the redundant verification one wants for the lede was provided by the broadcast notes. In the end, I had to pull a couple of things because I found no sign of them in either the provided source article or the notes. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.