Talk:FBI arrests nuclear engineer and wife on charges of espionage
Review of revision 4646266 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 4646266 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Some minor copyediting was done to improve the flow of the article, but apart from that, looks pretty good to me. Nice work! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4646266 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Some minor copyediting was done to improve the flow of the article, but apart from that, looks pretty good to me. Nice work! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
PACER access[edit]
It would be nice if we could identify the case numbers in juridical articles. Unfortunately, I have no experience with PACER.
And a fun fact: the New York Times have corrected their article, because they think they have mixed up the drop order, but now they ended up with contradicting the DOJ article. - Xbspiro (talk) 03:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- The DOJ usually puts out the complaint with the press release: Complaint link. I have an expired PACER account, but I'm having difficulty logging into it at the moment. PACER could definitely be useful for cases such as this if we were to have long-term coverage over. There's Recap which helps with accessing court documents by archiving documents PACER users access/pay for. Court documents can be rather expensive to access at the federal level, but you're allowed a certain amount of free access per quarter. —chaetodipus (talk · contribs) 05:28, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. Actually this was what I have been looking for, but did not notice the link in the press release. I think case (and bill) numbers might have a place in the articles themselves, as a form of specification. - Xbspiro (talk) 17:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Follow-up[edit]
For some reason it did not surface in news articles for a time, but they have pleaded guilty. Unfortunately, the press release is dated to February 14, which makes it stale already. - Xbspiro (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2022 (UTC)