Use past tense when reporting events like this. Attribute claims; and consider mentioning, when relevant, when the claim was made — as when the claim is about the current state of a changing situation, or when the information is best-available-at-the-time and better information might later become available.
A number of specifics did not appear —as best I could tell— to be in the sources. Some of these could have been things that were in earlier versions of the articles and were removed during "updates", as mainstream news sites these days sometimes follow the (bad) practice of later removing information from earlier versions of their articles.
It's sometimes necessary, I fully realize, to use non-English sources for a story like this. It really is quite difficult for us to work with, though. Just saying.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
Use past tense when reporting events like this. Attribute claims; and consider mentioning, when relevant, when the claim was made — as when the claim is about the current state of a changing situation, or when the information is best-available-at-the-time and better information might later become available.
A number of specifics did not appear —as best I could tell— to be in the sources. Some of these could have been things that were in earlier versions of the articles and were removed during "updates", as mainstream news sites these days sometimes follow the (bad) practice of later removing information from earlier versions of their articles.
It's sometimes necessary, I fully realize, to use non-English sources for a story like this. It really is quite difficult for us to work with, though. Just saying.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
