Talk:Football: Lewandowski's hat-trick against Armenia makes him Poland's top-scorer, close to World Cup qualification
Review of revision 4353740 [Not ready][edit]
Revision 4353740 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4353740 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- @Pi zero: the article is about becoming Poland’s top scorer. Ronaldo is from Portugal and if he scorers, only one statement becomes outdated. Even if we get rid of the whole paragraph, that would not effect the newsworthiness status since I never made that European Qualifier record as primary focus.
27.59.112.160 (talk) 15:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)- Nevertheless there was a paragraph devoted to the subject, and the situation had significantly changed, so I felt it needed to be addressed. I didn't feel deciding how to address it was something for a reviewer. --Pi zero (talk) 17:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Pi zero: That para was, but not the article. I don't know why I decided not to focus on that, and it really helped. Well, Poland won, and Lewandowski scored. source. I think I will write an article about it, to update things.
acagastya PING ME! 21:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Pi zero: That para was, but not the article. I don't know why I decided not to focus on that, and it really helped. Well, Poland won, and Lewandowski scored. source. I think I will write an article about it, to update things.
- Nevertheless there was a paragraph devoted to the subject, and the situation had significantly changed, so I felt it needed to be addressed. I didn't feel deciding how to address it was something for a reviewer. --Pi zero (talk) 17:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Review of revision 4353913 [Passed][edit]
Revision 4353913 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4353913 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |