Talk:Landslide in China leaves 41 people missing

Review of revision 4213494 [Not ready]

Revision 4213494 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This really needs about another two or three sentences. We ask for total volume equal to at least three medium-sized paragraphs, and this really falls below that — one just-about-medium-sized paragraph and two honestly short paragraphs. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4213494 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This really needs about another two or three sentences. We ask for total volume equal to at least three medium-sized paragraphs, and this really falls below that — one just-about-medium-sized paragraph and two honestly short paragraphs. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4213733 [Passed]

Revision 4213733 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Concerns from the previous review addressed; thanks. In judging how heavily I can edit within my purview as reviewer, I'm taking into account that some of this is helping the writer with their English. That does account for some of it; but there are also some difficulties with passages that I felt needed to be made more different from the sources — which, I realize, is also difficult to do if one is also striving to improve one's English. I'm hoping these problems will lessen over time; submitting to English Wikinews is, hopefully, a helpful experience. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4213733 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Concerns from the previous review addressed; thanks. In judging how heavily I can edit within my purview as reviewer, I'm taking into account that some of this is helping the writer with their English. That does account for some of it; but there are also some difficulties with passages that I felt needed to be made more different from the sources — which, I realize, is also difficult to do if one is also striving to improve one's English. I'm hoping these problems will lessen over time; submitting to English Wikinews is, hopefully, a helpful experience. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.