Talk:Main Page
|
This page is for discussing the Main Page only. This is not a place to ask general questions. If your query is not really directly related to the Main Page, consider the following locations:
|
[edit] Templates
The following templates are in use on the front page:
- {{Main page header}}, {{Lead article 1}}, {{Lead article 2}}, {{Lead article 3}}, {{Lead article 4}}, {{Lead article 5}}, {{Main page portals}}. The three centre sections may not maintain a consistent order; they are taken from: {{Main devel}}, {{Main historical}}, {{Main interviews}}, {{Main original}}, {{Main popular}}, {{Main about}}, {{Main around}}, {{Main write}}.
Contents |
[edit] Archives
Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6, Archive 7, Archive 8, Archive 9, Archive 10, Archive 11, Archive 12, Archive 13, Archive 14, Archive 15, Archive 16, Archive 17, Archive 18, Archive 19, Archive 20, Archive 21, Archive 22, Archive 23, Archive 24, Archive 25, Archive 26
[edit] Other
- General talk → Wikinews:Water cooler
- Admin attention needed → WN:ALERT
[edit] Orthography
There is a little mistake on the Main Page concerning NSW Supreme Court upholds non-publication order for lawsuit filed against Australia's richest person: the name is Gina Rinehart, not Gina RInehart! --House1630 (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] No News is WikiNews?
Seems like WikiNews has really slowed down lately—10 articles in the last 11 days, and not a single Article since October 1? Frankly, the Wikipedia Main Page has been a much better news source than WikiNews lately. What's going on around here, folks? 109.246.254.186 (talk) 00:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
-
- There was a discontent among editor which led to a fork (theopenglobe.org), so i guess the slow down might simply be a result of less editors. The fork is already covering the strike and unfolding events in the Italian wikipedia, maybe they are more active than wikinews.--Kmhkmh (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- What was the discontent about? It always seemed to me that there was a lot of hostility to new contributors here; I wrote a couple of articles, but the process has really put me off from contributing more. I may not have been the only one. 109.246.254.186 (talk) 23:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- There was a discontent among editor which led to a fork (theopenglobe.org), so i guess the slow down might simply be a result of less editors. The fork is already covering the strike and unfolding events in the Italian wikipedia, maybe they are more active than wikinews.--Kmhkmh (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Where is the OCCUPY WALL STREET coverage??? Good Grief 96.45.6.215 (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Italian Wikipedia shutdown
Is there a reason why there is no mention here in the last 2 days of the Italian Wikipedia shutdown? Jane023 (talk) 08:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- We aren't a blog or a wikimedia-internal newsletter — by which no offense is meant, but on one hand, an article would have to meet our publication standards and pass a rigorous peer review to be published —those [evidently, thus far,] interested in writing on that subject are unfamiliar with our site, and there is a steep learning curve for newcomers (over-commitment to a particular story is likely to interfere with one's ability to learn the site)— and on the other hand, being related to wikimedia does not increase its newsworthiness (which must be established by other means) and does present possible problems for avoiding conflict of interest. The COI problem may be insurmountable, as COI includes appearance of COI. One of the much-reduced number of active Wikinewsies (after the fork) has actually resigned from all wikimedia projects over the foundation's actions in this matter. It would be a daunting exercise in WN:NPOV even if the appearance of COI could be avoided. Also, nobody has tried; no article has been written and submitted to us for review. A stub was started some time back, which is woefully inadequate on many (most?) counts, and some of its shortcomings have been pointed out via tags/notes, but
no[little] attempt has been made to improve it. --Pi zero (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
