Talk:Polish authorities arrest Israeli agent

This is a Polish and Israeli hide and seek matter, of course!--Sainsf :) 08:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1043321 [Failed]

Revision 1043321 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:29, 13 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Use of encyclopedic date-style in opening sentence. Pleonasm. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1043321 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:29, 13 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Use of encyclopedic date-style in opening sentence. Pleonasm. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Hmm, but how else are we going to phrase that, avoiding the number? "The Friday before last" sounds rather awkward, saying June 4 makes more sense and is clearer. Tempodivalse [talk] 16:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

• Fourth of this month? C'mon! The thing is littered with redundancy, the sources aren't per WN:SG, and that howler in the opening. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 16:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict)I was in the middle of copy-editing it when you failed it; how I had it was "Polish authorities arrested an Israeli "spy" using the pseudonym Uri Brodsky on June 4 in connection with the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh." C628 (talk) 16:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

-shrug- I actually think using the month name is okay as well and shorter, but whatever. Source format fixed as well, resubmitted for review. Tempodivalse [talk] 16:44, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

• I'd have opened with 'earlier this month' and given the exact date in the 2nd or 3rd paragraph. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

• Exactly. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 17:24, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1043405 [Passed]

Revision 1043405 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Second time lucky? The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1043405 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Second time lucky? The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.