Talk:Post-probe, problematic peanut paste products pulled
This headline[edit]
This headline is very clever. It's also cloying and annoying. I'd miss the alliteration, but recommend changing it. Redvers (talk) 09:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Nah, it's fine, gets the point across nicely. Cirt (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- I must say, that was very clever. Bawolff ☺☻ 20:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Review[edit]
 |
Revision 760040 of this article has been reviewed by Mike Halterman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Well-written! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 760040 of this article has been reviewed by Mike Halterman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Well-written! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Headline is a joke[edit]
Seriously guys, this stuff isn't funny, its just annoying. Find another outlet for your comedic antics. This reeks of small town news. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.228.128.45 (talk • contribs)
ONE non-P word?[edit]
Couldn't it be "Following probe" or something just to break the pattern? 76.117.247.55 16:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Potentially problematic post perturbs passive posters... But seriously, Wikinews is not sterile. The headline did it's job by getting you to read an article that you would have normally ignored. ---Sigma 7 (talk)
- "Potentially problematic post perturbs passive posters", hahaha! that's genius. 137.82.175.12 21:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)