Talk:U.S. Congress reaches deal on payroll tax cut extension

Review of revision 1347650 [Not ready]

Revision 1347650 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: WSJ should be avoided as a source. Depending on when and where accessed, many (most?) WSJ articles are pay-to-view (pay-to-view sources being disallowed by Wikinews policy, of course). Specifically, I can't access this WSJ source article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1347650 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: WSJ should be avoided as a source. Depending on when and where accessed, many (most?) WSJ articles are pay-to-view (pay-to-view sources being disallowed by Wikinews policy, of course). Specifically, I can't access this WSJ source article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1347765 [Passed]

Revision 1347765 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I wondered if the "likely" prediction might be residual of the WSJ source; but even with a source I wouldn't care for the analysis implied, so would still prefer "may". The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1347765 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I wondered if the "likely" prediction might be residual of the WSJ source; but even with a source I wouldn't care for the analysis implied, so would still prefer "may". The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.