Talk:UK revokes visa of former Thai PM

Original Reporting notes

I previously emailed the Home Office for further information when working on one of the earlier stories. Their response arrived yesterday with the big warning that they won't discuss individual cases. However, it did outline the sections of law, the treaty involved, and other details used in paragraph three of this story.

The letter I received has been forwarded to scoop for other accredited reporters to confirm the accuracy of my original reporting. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 10:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I split the paragraph, so it is now paragraphs three and four, that the above applies. --SVTCobra 11:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I read the letter from the Home Office and can confirm that it was sent through scoop. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 14:17, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Review version 722735

Revision 722735 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A very nice article --SVTCobra 11:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 722735 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A very nice article --SVTCobra 11:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.