Talk:Wikinews interviews DuckDuckGo, Opera, Mozilla, Wikimedia about DoNotTrack feature

OR

• I am subscribed to DuckDuckGo Newsletters and received an email about the launch of the microsite. Then I replied to it and performed the interview, requested the images by e-mail. Gryllida 20:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

• I have requested similar questions from startpage and Mozilla (for the sake of not making the story look biased) as suggested by MC8. Please do not review the story yet. Gryllida 22:00, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

• That was done... and e-mailed to Wikinews... before the story was published. Just a reminder here to avoid confusion. -Gryllida 02:00, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1797722 [Passed]

Revision 1797722 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Gryllida forwarded me the emails, which match up with the reporting in the story. I'm not sure if they've been copied into Scoop, but if they haven't been, I'm happy to forward them. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1797722 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Gryllida forwarded me the emails, which match up with the reporting in the story. I'm not sure if they've been copied into Scoop, but if they haven't been, I'm happy to forward them. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Mozilla attribution

The contacted Mozilla press person prefers those responses be attributed to Mozilla. The gentle excision of the name from the interview comes a day and a half after publication —beyond the 24-hour horizaon— but is trivial, non-substantive relative to the topic of the interview, which factors into judging this a reasonable application of WN:IAR, keeping in mind the explicit acknowledgement in the Wikinews incarnation of that principle that some rules are not meant to be broken. The contactee's original remarks do specify this attribution (an oversight on our part), so this is also a matter of the conditions under which the information was provided. At this time, we're figuring it isn't necessary to hide the content of earlier revisions of the article in order to hide the press person's name, since the information does not appear to be confidential per se and, in any case, has already been visible on the web for some time so the proverbial cat is already out of the proverbial bag. --Pi zero (talk) 13:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Mis-spelled word in Bratsberg (Opera)'s reply

Near the end of the interview with Haakon Flage Bratsberg, he uses the phrase "rouge agents" -- you might want to either correct the spelling to "rogue agents" or add a [SIC] after it, as my guess is that he wasn't thinking of people wearing red makeup on their cheeks. :) Xyzzyavatar (talk) 04:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)