Comments from feedback form - "A few errors on this page made..."

A few errors on this page made it obvious it was written by someone with only scant knowledge of the AFL. The link to the Australian Associated Press is broken due to a typo, and the vernacular would be that Richmond had 17 more scoring shots that GWS. Frankly, it provides the reader with the required information, so I wouldn't get too worked up over it though.

You could have simply fixed the spelling error.

Don't agree on the terminology. It is a matter of preference. I've watched the footy on television and they don't call them scoring shots all the time.