Two nuclear submarines collide in the Atlantic Ocean
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
The France, and , of the British , collided deep under the middle of the in the middle of the night between February 3 and 4, despite both vessels being equipped with . The collision caused damage to both vessels but it did not release any , a (MOD) official confirmed Monday., from
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said nuclear security had not been breached. "It is MOD policy not to comment on submarine operational matters, but we can confirm that the U.K.’s deterrent capability was unaffected at all times and there has been no compromise to nuclear safety. Triomphant had struck 'a submerged object (probably a container)' during a return from a patrol, damaging the sonar dome on the front of the submarine," he said.
A French navy spokesman said that "the collision did not result in injuries among the crew and did not jeopardise nuclear security at any moment." Lack of communication between France and other members of NATO over the location of their deterrents is believed to be another reason for the crash.
According to Spanish border, and the northern coast of Spain west to , and is named for the Spanish province of , with average depth of 5,723 feet (1,744 m) and maximum depth is 9,151 feet (2,789 m)., the vessels collided 1,000ft in the (Golfe de ; Golfo de Vizcaya and Mar Cantábrico), a of the North . It lies along the western coast of France from south to the
Each submarine is laden with missiles powerful enough for 1,248, said.
It is unlikely either vessel was operating itsat the time of the collision, because the submarines are designed to "hide" while on patrol and the use of active sonar would immediately reveal the boat's location. Both submarines' hulls are covered with to reduce detection by sonar, so the boats' navigational would not have detected the presence of the other.
Lee Willett ofsaid "the NATO allies would be very reluctant to share information on nuclear submarines. These are the strategic crown jewels of the nation. The whole purpose of a sea-based nuclear deterrent is to hide somewhere far out of sight. They are the ultimate tools of national survival in the event of war. Therefore, it's the very last thing you would share with anybody."
, of the United Kingdom, the most senior serving officer in the Royal Navy, said that "...the submarines came into contact at very low speed. Both submarines remained safe. No injuries occurred. We can confirm the capability remains unaffected and there was no compromise to nuclear safety."
"Both navies want quiet areas, deep areas, roughly the same distance from their home ports. So you find these station grounds have got quite a few submarines, not only French and Royal Navy but also from Russia and the United States. Navies often used the same nesting grounds," said, an independent and analyst primarily known for his work in assessing and reporting upon and .
President of the Royal Naval Association John McAnally said that the incident was a "one in a million chance". "It would be very unusual on deterrent patrol to use active sonar because that would expose the submarine to detection. They are, of course, designed to be very difficult to detect and one of the priorities for both the captain and the deterrent patrol is to avoid detection by anything," he said.
The development of, making the submarines less visible to other vessels has properly explained that a submarine does not seem to have been able to pick out another submarine nearly the length of two football pitches and the height of a three-story building.
"The modus operandi of most submarines, particularly ballistic-missile submarines, is to operate stealthily and to proceed undetected. This means operating passively, by not transmitting on sonar, and making as little noise as possible. A great deal of technical effort has gone into making submarines quiet by reduction of machinery noise. And much effort has gone into improving the capability of sonars to detect other submarines; detection was clearly made too late or not at all in this case," explained Stephen Saunders, the editor of, an annual reference book (also published online, on and microfiche) of information on all the world's arranged by nation, including information on ship's names, dimensions, armaments, silhouettes and photographs, etc.
According to Bob Ayres, a former CIA and US army officer, and former associate fellow at, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, however, the submarines were not undetectable, despite their "stealth" technology. "When such submarines came across similar vessels from other navies, they sought to get as close as possible without being detected, as part of routine training. They were playing games with each other – stalking each other under the sea. They were practising being able to kill the other guy's submarine before he could launch a missile.Because of the sound of their nuclear reactors' water pumps, they were still noisier than old diesel-electric craft, which ran on batteries while submerged. The greatest danger in a collision was the hull being punctured and the vessel sinking, rather than a nuclear explosion," Ayres explained.
are uncommon, but not unheard of: in 1992, the , a submarine belonging to the United States, under command of Gordon Kremer, collided with the Russian attack submarine that was surfacing in the .
In 2001, the, off the coast of Hawaii. The Navy determined the commanding officer of Greeneville to be in "dereliction of duty."
The tenthof the British is the lead boat of of -capable submarines and is based at , . The 150m long, V-class submarine under the , has a crew of 135, weighs nearly 16,000 tonnes and is armed with 16 carrying three each.
It is now believed to have been towed Monday to its naval basein the , with dents and scrapes to its hull. Faslane lies on the eastern shore of in , , to the north of the and 25 miles west of the city of .
Vanguard is one of the deadliest vessels on the planet. It was built atby (now ), was on 4 March, 1992, and on 14 August, 1993. The submarine's first captain was . In February 2002, Vanguard began a two-year refit at . The refit was completed in June 2004 and in October 2005 Vanguard completed her return to service trials (Demonstration and Shakedown Operations) with the firing of an unarmed Trident missile.
"The Vanguard has two http://www.globalsecurity.org/, an easily accessible , and active in opposing the , and , and consulting on ., a CK51 search model and a CH91 attack model, both of which have a TV camera and thermal imager as well as conventional optics," said , director and a national security analyst for
"But the periscopes are useless at that depth. It's pitch black after a couple of hundred feet. In the movies like ' ,' you can see the subs in the water, but in reality it's blindman's bluff down there. The crash could have been a coincidence — some people win the lottery — but it's much more possible that one vessel was chasing the other, trying to figure out what it was," Pike explained.
Captain of HMS Vanguard, Commander Richard Lindsey said his men would not be there if they couldn't go through with it. “I'm sure that if somebody was on board who did not want to be here, they would have followed a process of leaving the submarine service or finding something else to do in the Navy,” he noted.
Theis a , lead ship of (SNLE-NG). It was laid down on June 9, 1989, launched on March 26, 1994 and commissioned on March 21, 1997 with homeport at . Equipped with 16 with six warheads each, it has 130 crew on board. It was completing a 70-day tour of duty at the time of the underwater crash. Its fibreglass sonar dome was damaged requiring three or four months in repair. "It has returned to its base on L'Ile Longue in on Saturday under its own power, escorted as usual by a frigate," the ministry said.
A Ballistic missile submarine is aequipped to launch ( ). Ballistic missile submarines are larger than any other type of submarine, in order to accommodate SLBMs such as the Russian or the American .
The French or , with the . They are replacing the boats. In French, they are called Sous-Marin Nucléaire Lanceur d'Engins de Nouvelle Génération ("SNLE-NG, literally "Device-launching nuclear submarine of the new generation").of strategic missile submarines of the are currently being introduced into service to provide the sea based component (the ) of the
They are roughly one thousand times quieter than the Redoutable-class vessels, and ten times more sensitive in detecting other submarines . They are designed to carry the nuclear missile, which should enter active service around 2010.
Repairs for both heavily scraped and dented, missile-laden vessels were "conservatively" estimated to cost as much as55m, with intricate systems and having to be replaced, and would be met by the French and British taxpayer, the reported.
Many observers are shocked by the, as well as the amount of time it took for the news to reach the public. ”Two US and five Soviet submarine accidents in the past prove that the reactor protection system makes an explosion avoidable. But if the collision had been more powerful the submarines could have sunk very quickly and the fate of the 250 crew members would have been very serious indeed,” said Andrey Frolov, from .
“I think this accident will force countries that possess nuclear submarines to sit down at the negotiating table and devise safety precautions that might avert such accidents in the future… But because submarines must be concealed and invisible, safety and navigation laws are hard to define,” Frolov said, noting further that there are no safety standards for submarines.
The unthinkable disaster – in the Atlantic's 41 million square miles – has raised concern among. "This is a nuclear nightmare of the highest order. The collision of two submarines, both with nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons onboard, could have released vast amounts of radiation and scattered scores of nuclear warheads across the seabed," said , chair of Britain's .
"This is the most severe incident involving a nuclear submarine since thein 2000 and the first time since the Cold War that two nuclear-armed subs are known to have collided. should seize this opportunity to end continuous patrols," Hudson added. Despite a rescue attempt by British and Norwegian teams, all 118 sailors and officers aboard Kursk died.
"This reminds us that we could have a new catastrophe with a nuclear submarine at any moment. It is a risk that exists during missions but also in port. These are mobile nuclear reactors," said, a spokesman for the French anti-nuclear group .
British Member of Parliament for has called for an immediate internal probe. "While the British nuclear fleet has a good safety record, if there were ever to be a bang it would be a mighty big one. Now that this incident is public knowledge, the people of Britain, France and the rest of the world need to be reassured this can never happen again and that lessons are being learned," he said.,
Westminster leader MP for has demanded for a government statement. "The Ministry of Defence needs to explain how it is possible for a submarine carrying weapons of mass destruction to collide with another submarine carrying weapons of mass destruction in the middle of the world's second-largest ocean," he said.
, , a Member of Parliament for and a City councillor for Fratton ward, and who sits on the , has called on the to make a statement when parliament sits next week.
"While I appreciate there are sensitive issues involved here, it is important that this is subject to parliamentary scrutiny. It's fairly unbelievable that this has happened in the first place but we now need to know that lessons have been learnt. We need to know for everyone's sakes that everything possible is now done to ensure that there is not a repeat of the incident. There are serious issues as to how some of the most sophisticated naval vessels in the seas today can collide in this way," Mr. Hancock said.
defence spokesman , a British politician, currently and Member of Parliament for , said: “For two submarines to collide while apparently unaware of each other’s presence is extremely worrying.”
Meanwhile,, the French , has denied allegations the nuclear submarines, which are hard to detect, had been shadowing each other deliberately when they collided, saying their mission was to sit at the bottom of the sea and act as a nuclear deterrent.
"There's no story to this -- the British aren't hunting French submarines, and the French submarines don't hunt British submarines. We face an extremely simple technological problem, which is that these submarines are not detectable. They make less noise than a shrimp. Between France and Britain, there are things we can do together....one of the solutions would be to think about the patrol zones," Morin noted, and further denying any attempt at a cover-up.
is known as a submarine graveyard because of the number of German and underwater craft sunk there during the .
Related news 
- "U.S. Nuclear submarine collides with Japanese tanker" — Wikinews, January 9, 2007
- "France says may seek better planning on sub routes" — , February 17, 2009
- The News (Portsmouth). "MP calls for inquiry into nuclear subs' Atlantic collision" — , February 17, 2009
- "Nuclear Submarines in sea crash" — , February 17, 2009
- Peter Allen and Tom Kelly. "How close did crash submarines packed with nuclear missiles come to disaster?" — , February 17, 2009
- Matt Sanchez. "How Nuclear Subs Could Go Bump in the Night" — , February 17, 2009
- Alastair Dalton. "MPs demand inquiry into 'hushed-up' nuclear subs crash" — , February 17, 2009
- Richard Knight. "Whose hand is on the button?" — , February 17, 2009
- Cahal Milmo. "So, Admiral, what have you got to say about the nuclear submarine crash? British and French vessels had enough material to carry out 1,248 Hiroshima bombings" — , February 17, 2009
- Tom Newton Dunn. "2 Navies' cover-up nuke sub crash" — , February 17, 2009
- Thomas Harding. "Nuclear alert as subs collide - Red faces and €55m bill after lucky escape" — , February 17, 2009
- John F. Burns. "Nuclear subs collide in Atlantic fender bender" — , February 17, 2009
- "Nuclear subs 'had sonar turned off'" — , February 17, 2009
- David Stringer. "British, French nuclear subs collide in Atlantic" — , February 17, 2009
- Bi Mingxin. "Backgrounder: Facts about two collided submarines" — , February 17, 2009
- "British-French Nuclear-Armed Submarine Collision Disclosed" — , February 17, 2009
- Leah Ferguson, RT. "News of UK-France nuclear submarine collision surfaces" — , February 17, 2009
- "Q&A: Submarine collision" — , February 16, 2009
- Aislinn Simpson. "British and French nuclear submarines collide in Atlantic" — , February 16, 2009
- "Nuclear subs 'collide in ocean'" — , February 16, 2009
- David Byers and Charles Bremner. "British and French nuclear submarines crash in Atlantic" — , February 16, 2009
- Eben Harrell. "Did France's Secrecy Cause a Nuclear Submarine Collision?" — , February 16, 2009