Dumpty-Humpty, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Our key policies - if you read anything, read these!
- Wikinews:Neutral point of view - tell every side to a story in a fair and balanced way
- Wikinews:Cite sources - everything in a Wikinews article must be sourced
Here a few pointers to help you get to know Wikinews:
- Wikinews:Introduction - overview of the site
- Wikinews:Writing an article - how to write and publish a complete article
- Wikinews:Content guide - what's suitable for Wikinews
- Wikinews:Style guide - how articles should look before publishing
- Wikinews:Contents - the contents page.
There are always things to do on Wikinews:
- Existing articles need expanding and checking for spelling and mistakes
- The front page lead articles often need updating
- Developing stories need finishing and publishing
- Discussions need your input
- Audio Wikinews could always use more contributors
- And of course, stories need writing!
By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Anonymous101
:) 05:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Late edit to articles 
Please note that articles should not be edited after they have been published for more than a day.Anonymous101
:) 05:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your edits to Northern Japan hit by strong quake have had to be reverted per policy.
10119:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- You were the first to inform me of this archiving policy! I failed to check when the article was published (it's not easy to check), though you had already said "they have been published for more than a day."
- It's desirable if editors easily read a pre-archiving notice and check how many hours have passed since the time of the first publish.
- News information on a disaster tends to be not accurate in first hours; even reliable sources can include mistakes or groundless facts. As to disaster reports, maybe we should establish exceptional archiving conventions. --Dumpty-Humpty (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing this article. However, just because I moved the external links, that does not mean that I endorse it for publication. As you can see in this diff, many more edits were needed. Please do not publish prematurely. Cheers, --SVTCobra 00:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- I check this matter. Sorry if it's my mistake. --Dumpty-Humpty (talk) 01:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- While you work on that, keep in mind that systems include people, it is not just the computers and machines. --SVTCobra 01:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
"A false quake warning in Japan exposes problems for practical use" is not a good title, what was wrong with my title which was "False earthquake warning in Japan exposes flaws in warning systems"? You have created a huge mess of double redirects. People are parts in systems! --SVTCobra 01:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- I know, I know. I understand your view, and maybe my title isn't the best, but I don't think it's nice to return to your title, which seems to be ambiguous. I mentioned it in detail on the talk page of that article. --Dumpty-Humpty (talk) 04:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your edits and updates to this article. Just a quick note, discussion about how to write the article or how it should be written are usually placed on the Help:Talk page, reached by clicking Collaboration at the top of the page, and creating a new section. Helps keep it in one place and to keep the page size lower for people just viewing the page.
Altering quotes 
Dumpty-Humpty, per Wikinews policy, you can't update a story already published. You will have to make the revisions with your added sources in a new article. I will be reverting your edits to the last stable page. If you wish to make minor edits to improve grammar, etc., you may do so. Thanks, —Calebrw (talk) 14:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, maybe I can create an article like "Narita Airport runway resumes 26 hours after cargo jet crash" but.... Dear Calebrw, it would be better if my correction of a factual error hadn't been reverted, though it was not a significant one (in Tokyo -->> near Tokyo). This is not the first time for me to think of exception to no-more edit rule as to braking news on calamity, fatal disaster, etc.: the sooner an article is published, the lower its quality may be. --Dumpty-Humpty (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)