User talk:Skenmy
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Contents |
[edit] Archives
[edit] Talk
[edit] Questions for Board candidacy
I appreciate that applications are still open, and the Q&A phase has not been started, but I want to bug you, and I'd invite other Wikinewsies to do so too.
- Do you feel you can genuinely devote the time to the board and not end up as a non-contributor on your home project?
- Are you in favour of more open (potentially radically open) communication between board and community?
- Do you believe that you can fairly represent projects you are not heavily involved in?
I'll be sticking these to all the candidates, so there is no rush to answer. --Brian McNeil / talk 08:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- I did not know that there was a question period/phase, so I'll reserve that for later. Good luck! Cirt (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Do you feel you can genuinely devote the time to the board and not end up as a non-contributor on your home project?
- I do honestly feel that I will be able to continue contributing to Wikinews in as many ways as I am already doing, if not more due to my further involvement with the Foundation and its' dealings.
- Are you in favour of more open (potentially radically open) communication between board and community?
- Strongly. It was actually one of my original candidacy statements until I had to trim it to 1200 characters! I believe that having more radically open communication between the board and the community is absolutely imperative, and as a Board member I will strive to have this implemented.
- Do you believe that you can fairly represent projects you are not heavily involved in?
- While I am not heavily involved in these projects, I believe I can understand their wants and needs. I am an avid reader of many of the mailing lists hosted by Wikimedia, and I often find myself browsing other project's policy pages to understand the unique needs of every project. As a community-elected board member, I want to be approachable - someone the communities can come to with the problems that require a board action, and act on their behalf - I'm not here to push my own agenda. My candidacy is based on the hope that I will be accepted as someone who can and will represent, fairly, the views of the communities behind me, whether or not I am an active contributor. We are all striving towards the same goals, at the end of the day, and it would be counter-productive to place the needs of one project (my home project, for instance) over another. --Skenmy(t•c•w) 15:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dumps
- Do you wish to comment on the chronic lack of database dumps of the English Wikipedia? -- Cimon Avaro (talk) 03:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- I am assuming this is a board candidacy question, so I will reply as if it is.
- The lack of dumps is concerning, as it hinders outside projects from benefiting from the content that is included in Wikipedia. However, I am sure that the technical team are aware of the issue and are working to resolve it - i'm also aware that this is not the only problem that goes on around Wikimedia and so resources may be stretched elsewhere. --Skenmy(t•c•w) 15:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikinews Bulletin
Here is the latest Wikinews bulletin. Enjoy!
|
Issue X - May 17, 2008 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The Wikinews Bulletin is a free internal newsletter for members of the Wikinews community. The newsletter is "staffed" by several editors, who produce the (more or less) fortnightly publication. Don't hesitate to join our team, or leave us a tip. The publication has produced nine issues. |
Anonymous101 :) 12:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Templates
We included that text in the footer because, for the first two years, Wikinews as published as public domain content. It is possible to present content which is alternatively licensed. I'm not sure it's possible to present and use code that is alternatively licensed, but you have a valid point I would need to research. - Amgine | t 17:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- 11. An obvious copyright violation that is a cut-and-paste exact or near-exact duplicate of content from a copyrighted source. Speedy delete does not apply for public-domain sources, when public domain reprint permission is granted from the original source and specified in the article talk page, or to articles with a third-party edit history.
- Are you saying Wikipedia is not copyrighted? - Amgine | t 17:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- As for whether a template is a program, I suggest you ask the Devs if the template code constitutes a programming language. - Amgine | t 17:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Then I believe the templates constitute an exact or near-exact duplicate of content from a copyrighted source, that Wikipedia does not constitute a public domain source, and that permission from the original source to migrate the license to CC-by does not exist. - Amgine | t 17:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikimag
Hello ! I contact you, to know if I can interview you for the Wikimag which is the equivalent of Sign Post on Wikipedia english. Like for User:Cspurrier. Thank you. - mik@ni 15:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] board election - question regarding Wikiversity
Hello Paul, since you seem more active in this Wikimedia project I wanted to ask you: since there are only a few days left until end of election I personally hope I still can see your response about this question regarding Wikiversity ? Thank you very much in advance, ----Erkan Yilmaz (evaluate me!, discussion) 15:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


