Wikinews:Reviewing articles

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!

This page is an official policy on the English Wikinews. It has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.

Shortcut: WN:REV WN:REVIEW

This policy in a nutshell:

All articles must go through independent Review prior to the Publish stage.

[edit] Development stage

Prior to review, the article may be developed, and this will be noted by the {{Develop}} tag. Articles in development mean that they need more information, sources, or the article is currently a work in progress.

Users in the class Wikinews:Editor can mark revisions of the article as sighted (review). Generally, editors should not sight/review articles in development.

(Note: the term "review" in this case does not mean that the article has passed the review stage, but rather that the particular revision marked can be seen by logged-out editors and IP viewers.)

All users in the class Wikinews:Editor automatically mark any revision that they have edited/saved as sighted/reviewed if the version before was also thus marked.

[edit] Review stage

Before publication, all articles must be reviewed by a user who was uninvolved in the development of the article. Please note that only users who have the editor permission should review and publish articles.

1. To ask for an article to be reviewed {{review}} should be added to the article. {{develop}} gets replaced by the review template, once the article has enough information, and has been checked for spelling and grammar errors.
2. The reviewer should check the article against the guidelines below.
3. Once complete, the review notes along with a pass or fail of the review process, should be placed on the article's talk page by the reviewer. Templates for passing or failing review can be found here.

[edit] Checklist

When reviewing the article, the reviewer must check the following:

1. Copyright: The reviewer should check that the text and images are not copyright infringement.
2. Newsworthiness: The reviewer should check that the article agrees with our content guide and is newsworthy.
3. Verifiability: The reviewer should check that all information in the article is fully sourced, (using multiple independent sources is strongly encouraged) or has adequate Original Reporting notes.
4. NPOV: The reviewer should check that all information in the article is written in a neutral and unbiased manner, with no editorial commentary/advocacy or unsourced opinion.
5. Style: The reviewer should check that all information in the article complies with our style guide (on dateline, grammar and spelling, "inverted pyramid" structure, tone, wikilinks, categories, headline... etc.)

[edit] Publish stage and review notes

1. After reviewing an article and making the appropriate edits, {{Peer reviewed}} (with all parameters filled) should be added to the talk page of the article.
2. {{Publish}} should be added to the article by the reviewer if the article is deemed satisfactory against the above checklist.