Auckland man convicted of sedition
Thursday, June 8, 2006
Selwyn faced two charges of "making a seditious statement" relating to pamphlets he had left near the scene of an axe attack on the Prime Minister's electorate office in November, 2004, which had called upon like-minded New Zealanders to "engage in similar acts of civil disobedience" and to "take similar action of their own". The charges were laid under s81(1)(c) of New Zealand's Crimes Act 1961, which criminalises any statement intended to "incite... or encourage violence, lawlessness, or disorder". The offence carries a penalty of up to two year's jail. After deliberating for almost four hours, the jury convicted Selwyn of one charge, and acquitted him of the other.
Speaking after the trial, Selwyn said that the jury had "criminalised a press statement".
The trial has raised significant controversy within New Zealand, with many bloggers protesting. Blogger Idiot/Savant called the verdict "shameful" and said that it "opened the door to further prosecutions for what is effectively a political crime".
Selwyn is currently free on bail pending sentencing next month, and is likely to appeal.
|This page has been automatically archived by a robot, and is no longer publicly editable.|
- "New Zealand Crimes Act 1961 (s80-85 - Seditious offences)" — , June 8, 2006
- "Auckland Man Found Guilty" — , June 8, 2006
- "Man found guilty of sedition" — , June 8, 2006
- NZPA and Bridget Carter. "Axe attack on PM's office prompts nationwide warning" — , November 18, 2004
- Idiot/Savant. "A shameful verdict" — , June 8, 2006
- Idiot/Savant. "Sedition Index" — , August 25, 2005
- Idiot/Savant. "Sedition by Example Index" — , August 24, 2005