Comments:Three-car accident in Birmingham, England leaves eight injured

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Notability321:49, 21 November 2011

Notability

There are very few headlines on the main page. Yet, a car crash in Birmingham made it on there.

This is notable for the 8 people injured as well as those close to them and their medical staff, it would also be of minor interest to the Birmingham traffic news.

It is however NOT notable or appropriate for world news, a world with 7,000,000,000+ inhabitants(within the species that reads alone) and a massive volume of events both important and notable.

If an article about traffic accidents is to be displayed on the main page, it should at least provide information on all traffic accidents of a day or more. 

Or a very very good reason why this one is so special.

7,000,000,000+, something of interest has certainly happened and alot of people have fared worse today.

Though horror and drama should not be decisive, since the greatest thing wikinews could do would be to provide relevant and important information without sensationalism. And without bias.

This article is irrelevant, indignified and inane, at best it's a waste of space at worst a distraction from important events. And it is wasting the credibility and notability of a newsforum that has the potential to provide a vital service.

If this article needs to be writen, and i don't see why, it needs to be put in an appropriately insignificant place.

This critisism is applicable to many articles.

68.233.235.50 (talk)16:29, 21 November 2011

Feel free to submit articles to Wikinews about other news events you think should be covered.

Pi zero (talk)16:41, 21 November 2011
 

I agree completely. this is not newsworthy, there are lots of other things that we'd like to read about.

156.8.251.250 (talk)20:37, 21 November 2011

This is a project reliant on volunteer contributions, thus that which volunteers choose to write articles on is what is going to end up published.

Would you prefer other stories covered, then please submit articles on them for review.

Brian McNeil / talk21:49, 21 November 2011