Comments:Women reveal accounts of forced abortion in Scientology

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "Good journalism. Presents both..."

Good journalism. Presents both sides of the story, backs up everything with references. A bit more info altogether would be better, though.

216.195.213.51 (talk)19:02, 15 June 2010

Thank you. Much appreciated. ;)

-- Cirt (talk)03:33, 16 June 2010
 

Comments from feedback form - "Great article...would love to ..."

Great article...would love to see more on this topic.

24.128.255.141 (talk)05:35, 15 June 2010

Sadly, there's only been 3 Scientology articles this year. See [1]

Mikemoral♪♫05:39, 15 June 2010

If only all religions had been thought up in the past few decades, then we would be able to heavily criticize all of them equally for outrageous acts in their early histories. I agree, more scientology scandals then it's only a matter of time before people turn their back on all religion and we can all move on.

Mcchino64 (talk)13:05, 15 June 2010

then it's only a matter of time before people turn their back on all religion and we can all move on.

I wish. But there's always going to be some fanatic proselytizer/scaremongerer and people foolish enough to believe them...

153.107.97.157 (talk)02:15, 16 June 2010

Eliminating religion is impossible. Even Atheists technically have a religion based on science. And you, to me, are a fanatic proselytizer for your religion. Don't expect everyone to believe exactly as you do, and nothing beyond that. Besides, could you really stand to have hundreds of people exactly like you in the world?

ArchabacteriaNematoda (talk)05:11, 19 June 2010

Atheism is not a matter of belief. By the word itself, it is a lack of such.

Brian McNeil / talk05:29, 19 June 2010
 

At the risk of attracting a hail of bullets from McNeil, I'll say it's not religion itself I have a problem with. It's the way people like to try and force it upon you (and each other). In particular, some people force babies and young children to be members of their chosen religion. That's not your bloody choice. Wait until the kid's old enough to decide. If yes, then fine. Don't expect me to take much interest, I certainly won't actively approve - but I will defend his or her right to do such.

Were it my responsibility, then yes, religious discrimmination would in most cases face increased sentencing powers - but equally, doing such things to your children as baptism etc when they can't possibly understand the concepts behind it would also be an offence.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)09:30, 19 June 2010
 
 
 

Thank you, there will probably be more articles on this topic coming soon. ;)

-- Cirt (talk)03:33, 16 June 2010
 

Very balanced article. Would like to see more about Scientology here, too. In fact, the thing I love about Wikinews is the references/sources, something that no other news site does..

187.40.212.17 (talk)00:53, 21 June 2010

Thank you!

Cirt's article; but, I really appreciate someone picking out points I think are really important in relation to how the project handles news coverage.

Brian McNeil / talk01:15, 21 June 2010

Thank you. :) It is interesting, to note the multiple comments requesting additional articles within this topic. :P

-- Cirt (talk)04:20, 21 June 2010

Which contrasts, somewhat starkly, with some religious zealotry around you getting involved here. Ah, fighting off POV-warring Wikipedians,.... Good Times. :P

Brian McNeil / talk10:09, 22 June 2010

Ah yes, I think the end resolution of all that was basically this. (Shutterbug most likely = Misou, per [1].) Cheers.

-- Cirt (talk)21:46, 22 June 2010