Talk:'Criminal in a police uniform' given eleven years jail for role in English drugs gang
As you might expect, some details are sourced from the old article and indeed some text is lifted directly from it. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1130585 [Failed][edit]
Revision 1130585 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1130585 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- From the Guardian: "Razaq had joined the Lancashire force nine years ago, becoming a sergeant after serving as a traffic officer in the motorway patrol." I also consider the lines "...to obtain information about his family and acquaintances. Officers became suspicious and..." to back that one up. Let me reword the hijacking. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 07:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Pi zero about the interpretation of Salim's bio. It is likely, from what little I know of police careers, that Salim was first a cadet then some kind of beat officer before joining traffic division / Motorway Unit. The Guardian sentence isn't conclusive one way or the other, and the early part of his career (before traffic and sergeant) is unimportant to the story. I reworded. --InfantGorilla (talk) 09:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1130666 [Passed][edit]
Revision 1130666 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1130666 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |