Size is just, comfortably imho, on the minimal line: any less and it'd be too little, but at this size I was actually a few minutes into the review before I paused to reflect on its length.
Note, Wikipedia is inherently not a trust-worthy source. If there's information in Wikipedia you want to use, you need to find, and cite, a trust-worthy source for it. Often, Wikipedia provides you with such a source — or at least claims to, although I've found often the source Wikipedia appears to cite for some bit of information actually doesn't provide that information. If Wikipedia doesn't provide you with a source you can use instead, then that makes Wikipedia's claim unsourced.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
Size is just, comfortably imho, on the minimal line: any less and it'd be too little, but at this size I was actually a few minutes into the review before I paused to reflect on its length.
Note, Wikipedia is inherently not a trust-worthy source. If there's information in Wikipedia you want to use, you need to find, and cite, a trust-worthy source for it. Often, Wikipedia provides you with such a source — or at least claims to, although I've found often the source Wikipedia appears to cite for some bit of information actually doesn't provide that information. If Wikipedia doesn't provide you with a source you can use instead, then that makes Wikipedia's claim unsourced.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
