Talk:33-year old charged with murder of Dalibor Pantic
Suspect name[edit]
Gippsland Times chose to name him, but given the Age and Victoria Police didn't, I decided against it. --LivelyRatification (talk) 03:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Last paragraph[edit]
@LivelyRatification: Hi, I'm having difficulty verifying the last paragraph. Is there a source missing by any chance? —chaetodipus (talk · contribs) 00:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Chaetodipus: Was mentioned in both the Gippsland TImes and age sources at the time of review, but given The Age appears to have removed it, I would take it out from the article. (Times says "Police have previously described Mr Pantic as operating in the drug scene in the Lakes Entrance, Bairnsdale and Sale areas, and said his Samsung Galaxy phone was found with drug associates at Wurruk.") LivelyRatification (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Review of revision 4649648 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 4649648 of this article has been reviewed by Chaetodipus (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Unfortunately had to cut some information from the final paragraph since sources were updated, but otherwise nothing of issue The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4649648 of this article has been reviewed by Chaetodipus (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Unfortunately had to cut some information from the final paragraph since sources were updated, but otherwise nothing of issue The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Broken URL[edit]
Just noticed the Victoria Police URL is broken, but when I try and add |brokenurl = true to the source template, the source only shows [archived version] with a link to the archived page, but without any other information from the source. Is this a glitch? --LivelyRatification (talk) 23:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)