Talk:Apple announces two billionth download from App Store

Review of revision 888259 [Failed]

Revision 888259 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: "coolest and most desirable brand of 2009" Where does that come from? NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 888259 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: "coolest and most desirable brand of 2009" Where does that come from? NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 888282 [Passed]

Revision 888282 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Note that I only checked that the changes were verifiable from that Register article. I trust the last reviewer to have checked everything else properly. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 888282 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Note that I only checked that the changes were verifiable from that Register article. I trust the last reviewer to have checked everything else properly. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Comment

I think I would have failed this article on newsworthiness - it seems about as interesting as Wikipedia getting its 1 millionth article (though I guess we might have run that...). Well, I'm not really around here anymore, so I guess I should hold back with judgements if I'm not willing to review myself. Sean Heron (talk) 16:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

It's not so much about the number itself, it is about how fast it is happening. 1.5bil was just a few months ago. Regardless, main stream media picked it up, and I think overall we lack in technews. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 16:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)