Talk:Australia's Channel Nine Network sacks two journalists for faking footage

Review of revision 1279085 [Failed]

Revision 1279085 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: The headline does not tell an international audience where in the world the story happened (an international audience can't be assumed to know what Channel Nine is). What the heck is a live cross? That doesn't go without explanation in the lede. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1279085 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: The headline does not tell an international audience where in the world the story happened (an international audience can't be assumed to know what Channel Nine is). What the heck is a live cross? That doesn't go without explanation in the lede. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1279219 [Passed]

Revision 1279219 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A number of passages were too close to the sources. Don't copy passages, and don't closely imitate their structure. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1279219 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A number of passages were too close to the sources. Don't copy passages, and don't closely imitate their structure. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.