Talk:Australia and Netherlands win 2014 Hockey World Cup

The images are from an earlier game in the series. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2692525 [Passed]

Revision 2692525 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There should be two independent source corroborating the men's final result. I've chosen not to raise a stink about it (and felt a bit queasy about this choice), but try not to let this happen. Note, the style guide specifies Sources ordering from newest to oldest, which would have helped to make this slip-up apparent. Elementary check for the lede: if it doesn't contain a "day" word, it almost certainly isn't answering basic question when, which is one of the most important to answer (as it goes directly to freshness), and should be one of the easiest to answer (if the focus is as specific as it should be). The lede also wanted some further clarification as to what sport was involved, since "hockey" to many (not sure if this is specific to USians) means by default "ice hockey". All the images had tags on them on Commons that suggested to me they'd likely get deleted. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2692525 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There should be two independent source corroborating the men's final result. I've chosen not to raise a stink about it (and felt a bit queasy about this choice), but try not to let this happen. Note, the style guide specifies Sources ordering from newest to oldest, which would have helped to make this slip-up apparent. Elementary check for the lede: if it doesn't contain a "day" word, it almost certainly isn't answering basic question when, which is one of the most important to answer (as it goes directly to freshness), and should be one of the easiest to answer (if the focus is as specific as it should be). The lede also wanted some further clarification as to what sport was involved, since "hockey" to many (not sure if this is specific to USians) means by default "ice hockey". All the images had tags on them on Commons that suggested to me they'd likely get deleted. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Hockey means "ice hockey" only in Canada and parts of the US. In the rest of the world it means "field hockey". Officially though, "hockey" is field hockey everywhere. That's why it's called the "Hockey World Cup". Thanks for your review! Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

I've straightened out all the images on Commons. They won't be deleted. The tags just meant that the assertion of their copyright status had to be double-checked by an admin. They've done them all now. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Okay — we're within the 24-hour window after publication, and the copyright does appear to be taken care of... although I'm worried about Commons having tagged them with stuff about replacing the images due to watermark since Wikinews can't accept substitute images after the 24-hour horizon... so I restored the images. I'd originally set out, during review, to tweak the captions to make clear that they aren't from the final game described in the article, so did that. --Pi zero (talk) 11:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)