Talk:BBC receives 487 complaints after 'Dancing' race row

I haven't finished writing up the article yet but I need to know is it OK for review? --Rayboy8 (talk) 08:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Not with a title that spans nearly 2 lines. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 10:02, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

OK, I think I've finished except for one thing. How do I change the article title? --Rayboy8 (talk) 10:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 894489 [Passed]

Revision 894489 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 894489 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

NPOV

This article has major NPOV concerns. 'It was racist, it was racist, it was racist, actually this really respected guy says its all overblown and she isn't in the least concerned but that doesn't matter BECAUSE WE SAY IT'S RACIST' was the impression I got from this article. Describing the previous comment as racist shows even less NPOV. It was highly controversial that it was treated as such. A golliwogg is a children's toy for fuck's sake. That people choose to make an insult of the word does not change the fact that it's primary meaning is a doll. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)