Talk:Bernie Sanders endorses Joe Biden in 2020 United States presidential election

Review of revision 4559349 [Not ready]

Revision 4559349 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I have two concerns about this. (I've verified everything it current says, btw.) It really wants another sentence or two, to feel solidly on the safe side of the minimal-length threshold. The third paragraph, besides being very-short (SG recommends against counting those toward minimal length), is weak analysis (a small neutrality irritant). Some objective facts relating to this aspect of the situation would serve the purpose better, providing the reader with solid information by which to assess for themselves. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4559349 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I have two concerns about this. (I've verified everything it current says, btw.) It really wants another sentence or two, to feel solidly on the safe side of the minimal-length threshold. The third paragraph, besides being very-short (SG recommends against counting those toward minimal length), is weak analysis (a small neutrality irritant). Some objective facts relating to this aspect of the situation would serve the purpose better, providing the reader with solid information by which to assess for themselves. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4559355 [Not ready]

Revision 4559355 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The revision (thanks for the prompt response) shifts the analysis from us to the news sources; our hope, though, is to not report on the opinions of reporters, regardless of whether they're reporters on Wikinews or some other news org. (Thus, attributing a fact to reports is acknowledging one should keep in mind that's where it's from, but attributing an opinion to reports is generally to be avoided.) We could report that someone who's part of the story expressed such-and-such opinion. For more objective points of interest, we could mention (e.g., not forgetting the minimal-length concern), that Sanders declined to endorse Biden when asked in that interview on the 8th (mentioned in the earlier article), or that Biden's campaign is the only one still active on the Democratic side. There are, iirc, some other related tidbits scattered about the sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4559355 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The revision (thanks for the prompt response) shifts the analysis from us to the news sources; our hope, though, is to not report on the opinions of reporters, regardless of whether they're reporters on Wikinews or some other news org. (Thus, attributing a fact to reports is acknowledging one should keep in mind that's where it's from, but attributing an opinion to reports is generally to be avoided.) We could report that someone who's part of the story expressed such-and-such opinion. For more objective points of interest, we could mention (e.g., not forgetting the minimal-length concern), that Sanders declined to endorse Biden when asked in that interview on the 8th (mentioned in the earlier article), or that Biden's campaign is the only one still active on the Democratic side. There are, iirc, some other related tidbits scattered about the sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4559423 [Passed]

Revision 4559423 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Length is just faintly better, because the sentence that's replaced the presumptive-nominee thing feels a bit more substantial. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4559423 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Length is just faintly better, because the sentence that's replaced the presumptive-nominee thing feels a bit more substantial. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.