Talk:Cadillac unveils Obama's 'Beast', the 2009 Presidential State Car

I CREATED this January 20 Obama Car. Hope this is bullet proof, though. Please help in correcting the STYLE writing so that this may be forthwith published in COLLABORATION. Cheers.--Florentino Floro (talk) 07:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Sources

Are all of these sources actually used? I think it's a bit many sources if we don't actually use every one of them, and we might be able to trim some down (makes it difficult to review the article). Cary Bass (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Paranoia on safety vis-a-vis dire attempts on Obama

Thanks, Sir. I deeply understand that too many sources do have review disadvantages for the Wiki peer reviewer. But, I just want to be sure, that, a particular important fact or detail has back up. This article is not a legal but motoring news article and is highly technical. In the past, when I had created articles on disasters and accidents, I could'nt find just 2 or 3 articles which contain all critical facts. So, I had to have tons of sources. Further, in one or 2 difficult articles I wrote, an editor marked these as Failed and I asked for another review after putting updated back-ups.

So, sir, this is the marked difference between my Wiki created news articles and ordinary news reports we find in Google or BBC: my created article is SYNTHESIS of almost all past and updated reports, such that the reader will find all chunks like in a delicious hamburger. I know that Wiki editors might have some fear seeing tons of sources, but it is good for reliability. The reader must be safe with sure sources. And thanks for the comment; please feel free to delete, revise, modify etc. this, due to our COLLABORATION, I just being the CREATOR. A final WARNING though: PARANOIA - this truck car which is ASTEROID free, is built due to DIRE PROPHECIES about OBAMA's not finishing his term. Remember 2 articles in Wikipedia about 2 assassination attempts on Obama plus many DIRE omen. So, I want this article to be PARANOID too like in the car with sure sources. Just sayin. This car is eerie.--Florentino Floro (talk) 06:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Review

Revision 753300 of this article has been reviewed by brianmc (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: please be careful to minimise sources, first two were duplicates The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 753300 of this article has been reviewed by brianmc (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: please be careful to minimise sources, first two were duplicates The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

--Brian McNeil / ^talk 08:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Question

Shouldn't there be a picture of the new car in this article?