Talk:China threatens to take action over US-Taiwan deal
Add topicSources
[edit]I think you are a little over-reliant on the BBC for your sources. I understand you have one independent source but the extra information seems to come from the beeb too - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 21:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- My concern is that the Chinese aren't yet taking action - they're threatening it. --Brian McNeil / talk 21:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've rephrased that to make it clearer. — μ 00:39, Sunday January 31 2010 (UTC)
- Which isn't reflected in the title. I would fail this on review as is. 75.168.140.67 (talk) 06:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- That was me, by the way. It seems as if Firefox3.6 is messing with my sessions, but I could just be crazy. Calebrw (talk) 06:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've rephrased that to make it clearer. — μ 00:39, Sunday January 31 2010 (UTC)
Grammar
[edit]The grammar of this article needs to be thoroughly checked before a peer review is done on it. I got rid of some commas splices and other errors, but I'm sure I missed some. Calebrw (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 948594 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 948594 of this article has been reviewed by Dendodge (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: This has been waiting for a review for far too long The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 948594 of this article has been reviewed by Dendodge (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: This has been waiting for a review for far too long The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |