The length is marginal; I've taken it to be just barely minimal-length; some reviewers would likely judge it slightly below minimal length.
There were quite a few passages too close to source, especially considering the length; I was concerned from the start that if I tried to fix those I'd have edited such a large fraction of the minimal article I might have to disqualify myself.
Who said what — attribution — needed a number of improvements during review. Attribution is an important facet of journalism.
I was a bit concerned about how much of this is through Radio Okapi, but it doesn't seem to be altogether single-source through that bottleneck.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
The length is marginal; I've taken it to be just barely minimal-length; some reviewers would likely judge it slightly below minimal length.
There were quite a few passages too close to source, especially considering the length; I was concerned from the start that if I tried to fix those I'd have edited such a large fraction of the minimal article I might have to disqualify myself.
Who said what — attribution — needed a number of improvements during review. Attribution is an important facet of journalism.
I was a bit concerned about how much of this is through Radio Okapi, but it doesn't seem to be altogether single-source through that bottleneck.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
