Talk:Delhi earns UN carbon credits

Review of revision 1292142

Revision 1292142 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Some suggestions to improve technique: Aim to write individual synthesis sentences that draw on multiple source passages, either multiple passages far form each other in a source, or better yet, multiple passages from different sources. Don't follow the sentence structure of a source; rearrange the ordering of ideas within a source passage. Leaving out a few of the less important ideas from a source passage helps. Watch out for 'paraphrase' that actually changes the meaning from what the sources said. In my role as reviewer, my edits have been to remove material (mainly distance from source, unverified, brevity for clarity), reorder passages for distance from sources, and surgically clarify/correct a few presented facts. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1292142 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Some suggestions to improve technique: Aim to write individual synthesis sentences that draw on multiple source passages, either multiple passages far form each other in a source, or better yet, multiple passages from different sources. Don't follow the sentence structure of a source; rearrange the ordering of ideas within a source passage. Leaving out a few of the less important ideas from a source passage helps. Watch out for 'paraphrase' that actually changes the meaning from what the sources said. In my role as reviewer, my edits have been to remove material (mainly distance from source, unverified, brevity for clarity), reorder passages for distance from sources, and surgically clarify/correct a few presented facts. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Review of revision 1292150 [Passed]

Revision 1292150 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I'm a klutz. See my detailed review comments above. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1292150 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I'm a klutz. See my detailed review comments above. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.