Talk:Delhi rocked by bomb blasts

Peer Review

Revision [1] of this article has been reviewed by WNewsReporter (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: The fact that the article only has one source is a problem. If another one could be found, that would be great. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: More detail should be given to the attacks themselves, as well as the police/government response, etc. This is pretty much a necessity in order for the article to be passed. Comments by reviewer: Just find another source, expand the article a bit, add some Wikipedia and Wikinews links, and this will be good to go. However, at this time, it is not. WNewsReporter (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision [2] of this article has been reviewed by WNewsReporter (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: The fact that the article only has one source is a problem. If another one could be found, that would be great. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: More detail should be given to the attacks themselves, as well as the police/government response, etc. This is pretty much a necessity in order for the article to be passed. Comments by reviewer: Just find another source, expand the article a bit, add some Wikipedia and Wikinews links, and this will be good to go. However, at this time, it is not. WNewsReporter (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Reactions

This needs to rewritten into a news style. Listing quotes, especially in this format is very unprofessional and IMO just looks bad. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 01:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I think it looks fine as-is just now. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Review 2

Revision 692438 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 692438 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.