Talk:Details emerge in Haiti earthquake; thousands feared dead

Review of revision 936453 [Passed]

Revision 936453 of this article has been reviewed by Juliancolton (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 936453 of this article has been reviewed by Juliancolton (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

{{editprotected}}

This link is not correct: "Massive Earthquake Devastates Haiti" – VOA News, January 13, 2010. It is a dead URL. http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/americas/Massive-Earthquake-Devastates-Haiti-81311282.html

I tried looking for the correct link on VOA, but couldn't find it in the archives.

Not done VOA News recurrently cleans up the old news, and this is an archive, we can't do much. The link has to stay. --Diego Grez ^{let's talk} 16:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Images/video

Are any attempts being made to clarify the licensing status of the images and video? Adambro (talk) 17:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Surely they are copyrighted until we learn otherwise and then we can't use them?    Tris   18:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Now that we have some free images (e.g. those on Haitian earthquake: in pictures), should we replace the copyrighted ones in this article? the wub "?!" 21:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)