Talk:Egyptian military appoints committee to amend constitution

Review of revision 1180353 [Failed]

Revision 1180353 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: [..]United States, but is distrusted by some in the United States seems redundant, could we have some better wording? Cannot find a mention to being a radical religious group; BBC says that one guy said it was secular, but nothing about radicalisation. I can't see Atef stating that he would support a brand-new constitutiion, only talking about the effects of one In an attempt to shorten review queue time, I have reviewed the rest of this article, and can verify the facts as independently reviewed. Feel free to just review the diff between the current revision and that of 1180353, and let the rest fall on my head. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1180353 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: [..]United States, but is distrusted by some in the United States seems redundant, could we have some better wording? Cannot find a mention to being a radical religious group; BBC says that one guy said it was secular, but nothing about radicalisation. I can't see Atef stating that he would support a brand-new constitutiion, only talking about the effects of one In an attempt to shorten review queue time, I have reviewed the rest of this article, and can verify the facts as independently reviewed. Feel free to just review the diff between the current revision and that of 1180353, and let the rest fall on my head. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

On the second point, CNN says "others call it a radical extremist group hellbent on creating a theocracy in Egypt." I'd thought "see it as a radical religious group" a reasonable paraphrase. --Pi zero (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I've tried to address the other points. --Pi zero (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1180398 [Passed]

Revision 1180398 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1180398 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.