Talk:Eleventh Docudays UA concludes

Original reporting notes

On-the-spot notes

just the order of people appearing on the stage (i have sent the photo of the list). the names of the directors, films and the jury justifications were cited from this page [1] --Antanana (talk) 13:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Information shared privately for off-wiki confirmation

the corresponding videos were sent as well --Antanana (talk) 13:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2511295 [Not ready]

Revision 2511295 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I don't seem to have received anything on scoop. What I haven't been able to provide any verification for: Which jury members were awarding, and which were present. The whole paragraph about Nikita Mikhalko. The number of documentaries competing (36). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2511295 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I don't seem to have received anything on scoop. What I haven't been able to provide any verification for: Which jury members were awarding, and which were present. The whole paragraph about Nikita Mikhalko. The number of documentaries competing (36). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

It's possible, of course, that some of this can be verified from the web site, if I knew where to look (but I didn't manage to find it, on my own). --Pi zero (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

would you mind looking for my emails? attolippipgmail.com. i shall send them again --アンタナナ 20:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Which jury members were awarding, and which were present. - the full list of the jury members for each program. i have taken pictures of the ones present at the ceremony itself

The whole paragraph about Nikita Mikhalko - see the video on the scoop

The number of documentaries competing (36) - see the video on the scoop

--アンタナナ 20:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

The captions in the gallery also need to be reworded; there are a few style issues (missing periods/full stops) and inappropriate phrases ("guys"). Microchip08 (talk) 23:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

At this time, I can't connect to the scoop email server; I'm now seriously annoyed. (I was able to earlier this evening when I was doing this review, so it's a recent development.) --Pi zero (talk) 01:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

there were 36 movies competing - 10 for DOCU/Right [2], 10 for DOCU/Life [3] and 16 for DOCU/Short [4]. the films are the ones, that are... flipping over? --アンタナナ 01:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Eureka: this morning I have a connection to the scoop server. Hopefully it'll keep working, and I can start in on this review again in a little while. --Pi zero (talk) 12:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2513642 [Passed]

Revision 2513642 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Had some difficulty over the date in February, because it was first announced as the 18th, the credibility of which was however thrown into question by the month being misnamed on that occasion, which was corrected by members of the audience. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2513642 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Had some difficulty over the date in February, because it was first announced as the 18th, the credibility of which was however thrown into question by the month being misnamed on that occasion, which was corrected by members of the audience. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.