Talk:F.C. Barcelona wins Copa del Rey 2014-2015

Review of revision 3551626 [Not ready]

Revision 3551626 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: This is below minimal length, which is at least three paragraphs with total text equivalent to about three medium-sized paragraphs (medium-sized for a news article, that is, which would be small for an encyclopedia article; the text doesn't have to be evenly distributed between paragraphs). Here the lede paragraph is kind of long. I'd say a few more sentences are wanted. A complication is that somebody else has now submitted an article about, it looks like, the same event; they've never contributed to Wikinews before, apparently, and I haven't checked to see (for example) whether they knew to avoid copyvio. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 3551626 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: This is below minimal length, which is at least three paragraphs with total text equivalent to about three medium-sized paragraphs (medium-sized for a news article, that is, which would be small for an encyclopedia article; the text doesn't have to be evenly distributed between paragraphs). Here the lede paragraph is kind of long. I'd say a few more sentences are wanted. A complication is that somebody else has now submitted an article about, it looks like, the same event; they've never contributed to Wikinews before, apparently, and I haven't checked to see (for example) whether they knew to avoid copyvio. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 3558925 [Passed]

Revision 3558925 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There were details I had a lot of trouble verifying. Everything has to be verified from the sources. You should have cited the earlier article as a source — which you do by listing it in a Related news section; I did that for you, but it's more than a reviewer can be asked to do and it's just lucky that I knew to do it since I'd reviewed the other. That covered some things, and the stuff about Juventus I managed to turn up after some digging. About the first two out of three hours on this review, with admittedly various real-world distractions, were spent on format-related stuff; review gets a lot more efficient as Wikinews writers get more fluent in these details. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 3558925 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There were details I had a lot of trouble verifying. Everything has to be verified from the sources. You should have cited the earlier article as a source — which you do by listing it in a Related news section; I did that for you, but it's more than a reviewer can be asked to do and it's just lucky that I knew to do it since I'd reviewed the other. That covered some things, and the stuff about Juventus I managed to turn up after some digging. About the first two out of three hours on this review, with admittedly various real-world distractions, were spent on format-related stuff; review gets a lot more efficient as Wikinews writers get more fluent in these details. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.