Talk:First NASA TROPICS satellites launch to monitor tropical storms

Review of revision 4725971 [Not ready]

Revision 4725971 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: The "when" of the story is not stated in the lead ("recently" doesn't work). Comments by reviewer: Also, the lead presents a suitable focal event (the launch), but the headline presents a different one (and it violates WN:FUTURE and doesn't have a verb); this could be remedied by inserting "launches" into the headline. Speaking of which, there are several instances of the WN:FUTURE-prohibited future tense in the body, so please address those. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4725971 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: The "when" of the story is not stated in the lead ("recently" doesn't work). Comments by reviewer: Also, the lead presents a suitable focal event (the launch), but the headline presents a different one (and it violates WN:FUTURE and doesn't have a verb); this could be remedied by inserting "launches" into the headline. Speaking of which, there are several instances of the WN:FUTURE-prohibited future tense in the body, so please address those. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

And please ensure, per WN:CS, that all sources are necessary. Heavy Water (talk) 21:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Hey Heavy Water thanks for the review and the notes. Also thank you for taking the time to go over this I know it must be frustrating to keep having to point out all these errors but I really do appreciate it. I've gone ahead and implemented the requested revisions, expanded the article a bit, updated the images, and removed a couple of the sources. Dr vulpes (talk) 23:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

I did many of the same things myself originally; it's all good. Heavy Water (talk) 23:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Review of revision 4726182 [Passed]

Revision 4726182 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Say something in a minute. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4726182 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Say something in a minute. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

@Dr vulpes: Sorry, I wanted to publish that before midnight UTC. Now, we published three articles on Tuesday UTC (and I did three passing reviews, more than I've ever in a day).
Anyway, really good work for a second article. Please see the edit history for details of what I did. Heavy Water (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

And I removed the CBS source because it didn't appear necessary. Heavy Water (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

@Heavy Water Thanks I'll be sure to review the edits you made and try to do better with the next one. Dr vulpes (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)