Talk:Four killed, dozens injured in Jerusalem attack on bus
Title problematic[edit]
The reports I've seen say 4 were killed including the driver of the backhoe. The title of this article makes the problematic assertion that his death also fits under the rubric of "murder". 71.87.23.22 18:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- I have, therefore, changed the title to read that 4 are dead, without saying murdered or killed, or whatever. TShilo12 (talk) 18:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm uncomfortable with the assertion it was terror. It has all the hallmarks of a random mass-murer by a suicidal individual, although they are similar in many respects to terror attacks. Only if there were clear proof - like a suicide note - saying it were terror would I be comfortable saying more than 'believed to be' or 'alledged to be' terror and attributing who says so. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- It has been so classified by the Jerusalem police and the IDF. Take it up with them. People were certainly terrorized. 71.87.23.22 19:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm uncomfortable with the assertion it was terror. It has all the hallmarks of a random mass-murer by a suicidal individual, although they are similar in many respects to terror attacks. Only if there were clear proof - like a suicide note - saying it were terror would I be comfortable saying more than 'believed to be' or 'alledged to be' terror and attributing who says so. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Note[edit]
Unfourtunately the original article was a copyvio so I deleted the original aritcle, wrote a new article and renamed it to avoind copyright violation. That is why the article has got shorter. Anonymous101 (talk) 20:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
WP article[edit]
I'm not sure what Wikinews practice is with respect to news articles on topics about which there is also a Wikipedia article. In this case, the article in question on Wikipedia is Jerusalem bulldozer attack. Can it be added in a ==See also== section, or is that against some Wikinews common practice I don't know about? Thanks, TShilo12 (talk) 04:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- In these cases, the Wikipediapar template is added to the Sources section, creating a link to the Wikipedia article. Thanks for bringing it to our attention, though I kinda hate it when Wikipedia's article is more detailed than ours... oh, well. :-) ~Planoneck~ 05:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)